California Court of Appeal

In an action brought against insurers on insurance policies providing coverage for losses to property caused by theft or forgery committed by plaintiff's employees, summary judgment for the insurers is affirmed where: 1) the losses that plaintiff claimed to have sustained in its discovery responses were not covered by the property insurance contracts at issue; and 2) a contention that the theft of McDonald-s game pieces was a covered loss was without merit.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/13/2007
• Published 04/10/2007

Judges

• FLIER, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Michelman & Robinson and Catherine L. Rivard, Encino, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Musick, Peeler & Garrett, Gilbert D. Jensen and Jennifer M. Kokes, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Federal Insurance Company., Anderson, McPharlin & Conners, David T. DiBiase and Lisa Le Nay Coplen, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Gulf Insurance Company.