California Court of Appeal
Kumar v. Superior Court of Sonoma County, A114803
In proceedings arising from an order requiring petitioners-inn operators to comply with legislative subpoenas issued by a city for the production of business records necessary for auditing their compliance with city-s transient occupancy tax, operators' petition for extraordinary relief is denied as: 1) the definitions in the city's ordinance are not vague; 2) petitioners' equal protection argument was without merit; and 3) the city ordinance is not preempted by state law.
Appellate Information
- Decided 03/16/2007
- Published 04/09/2007
Judges
- PARRILLI, J.
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Joseph M. Quinn, Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, San Francisco, CA, Eric W. Danly, Nancy Thorington, Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, Santa Rosa, CA, for Real Party in Interest City of Cloverdale., Frank A. Weiser, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.