Citizens for a Megaplex-Free Alameda. v. City of Alameda, A114941
In case involving redevelopment project to rehabilitate a historic theatre and build a cineplex and parking structure, denial of petition for writ of mandamus alleging defendant violated CEQA is affirmed as Public Resources Code section 21166 applied, requiring no subsequent or supplemental EIR, plaintiff has failed to show that the defendant's action were unsupported by substantial evidence, and none of plaintiff's other contentions were persuasive.
- Decided 03/29/2007
- Published 03/29/2007
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Brandt-Hawley Law Group, Susan Brandt-Hawley, Glen Ellen, Paige J. Swartley, for Plaintiff and Appellant., Donald J. Black, Santa Rosa, for Real Party in Interest.
- For Appellees:
- Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger, Ellen J. Garber, Robert S. Perlmutter; Sheridan J. Pauker, San Francisco; Teresa L. Highsmith, Alameda City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.