California Court of Appeal

In case where defendant was held to answer on charge of being an accessory after the fact to a 1996 murder, an order setting aside the information under Penal Code section 995 is reversed as the evidence adduced at the preliminary hearing was sufficient to support the accessory charge.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/19/2007
• Published 03/19/2007

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Michael A. Ramos, District Attorney, and Mark A. Vos, Lead Deputy District Attorney, for Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• David Michael Lumb;  Joseph F. Walsh, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent.