California Court of Appeal

Sustaining of demurrer to complaint, in case involving challenge to approval of a coastal development permit, is affirmed over claims that the dismissal was improper procedurally, because the demurrer was unauthorized and untimely, and that the dismissal was improper substantively because plaintiff has a valid cause of action against defendant county based on jurisdictional grounds and based on the county-s violation of the CEQA.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/31/2007
• Published 01/31/2007

Judges

• McADAMS, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Fenton & Keller, John S. Bridges, Mark A. Cameron, David C. Sweigert, Monterey, Jennifer M. Pavlet, for Appellant., Lombardo & Gilles, Sheri L. Damon, Salinas, for Real Parties in Interest.


• For Appellees:
  
• Charles J. McKee, County Counsel, Frank G. Tiesen, Deputy County Counsel, for Respondent.