California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Temple City Redev. Agency v. Bayside Drive Ltd. P'ship, B189736

In eminent domain actions, involving the sale of an easement that led to plaintiff's voluntary dismissal of action against defendant, denial of litigation expenses sought by plaintiff under Code of Civil Procedure section 1268.610(a)(1) is reversed as trial court erred in finding the statute did not apply when the dismissal did not result from plaintiff abandoning the case, but from defendant selling the property.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 01/25/2007
  • Published 01/25/2007

Judges

  • VOGEL, Acting P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Law Office of Christopher Sutton and Christopher Sutton, Pasadena, for Defendant and Appellant., Hill, Farrer & Burrill and Dean E. Dennis, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard