California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Ross v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit Dist., A110543

In action for wrongful termination and age and disability discrimination, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) Government Code section 815.2(b) provides immunity to a public entity for its vicarious liability for the wrongs of its employees and its own direct liability; 2) the trial court correctly found that plaintiff failed to make a prima facie showing of age discrimination; and 3) plaintiff's notation on his FEHA complaint that he was "36.5% disabled" did not create a triable issue over whether he exhausted administrative remedies.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 01/24/2007
  • Published 01/24/2007

Judges

  • MARGULIES, J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Law Offices of Joan Wolff, Joan Wolff, Los Angeles;  Michael Couzens for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Office of the General Counsel, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Thomas C. Lee for Defendant and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard