Said v. Jegan, B182232
Summary judgment denying plaintiff's petition to determine that he is not the father of former wife's son, on the ground that he lacked standing as a presumed father to maintain such an action, is reversed where he presented sufficient evidence to show he might qualify as the presumed father.
- Decided 01/23/2007
- Published 01/23/2007
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Jaffe & Clemens, Daniel J. Jaffe, Beverly Hills, and Aimee H. Gold; Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Robin Meadow and Dana Gardner Adelstein, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Glen H. Schwartz and Larry M. Hoffman for Defendants and Respondents.