Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Lozada v. City and County of San Francisco, A111423

Where claims for money and damages pursued by a public safety officer were more than "incidental" to declaratory and injunctive relief sought for alleged violations of the Public Safety Officers' Procedural Bill of Rights Act, the officer must present a claim to the public entity employer pursuant to the Government Claims Act.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/18/2006
  • Published 12/18/2006


  • KLINE, P.J.


  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellant:
  • Philip J. Kaplan, Law Offices of Philip J. Kaplan, Los Angeles, for Appellant., Silver, Hadden & Silver, Lawrence J. Friedman, Stephen H. Silver, Santa Monica, for Amicus Curiae, The Peace Officers' Research Association of California Legal Defense Fund, in Support of Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Dennis J. Herrera, City Attorney, Molly Stump, Chief Atty-Public Protection Team, David A. Carrillo, Katharine Hobin Porter, for Respondents., Martin J. Mayer, Krista MacNevin Jee, Fullerton, Jennifer Henning, Jones & Mayer, for Amici Curiae, League of California Cities, California State Sheriff's Association, and California Police Chiefs' Association, California State Association of Counties, In Support of Respondents.
Copied to clipboard