California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Faughn v. Perez, F049066

Disqualification of plaintiffs' attorney, based on defendant's contention that the attorney formerly represented its parent corporation and that he acquired confidential information about defendant, is reversed where the motion to disqualify relied too heavily on inferences and information that could have been disclosed without compromising confidential information.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/05/2006
  • Published 12/05/2006



  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellant:
  • Law Offices of Marshall Silberberg, Marshall Silberberg, Newport Beach, Adam P. Harris;  and Law Offices of Carl A. McMahan for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Clifford & Brown, Stephen T. Clifford, John R. Szewczyk and Daniel T. Clifford, Bakersfield, for Defendant and Respondent Bakersfield Memorial Hospital.
Copied to clipboard