California Court of Appeal
Parra v. City and County of San Francisco, A112331
Denial of motions to dismiss charges of violations of police department orders and rules of conduct, brought by seven San Francisco police officers who became involved with an incident known as "Fajitagate," are affirmed as the one-year limitation provision governing discipline of officers contained in the Public Safety Officers' Procedural Bill of Rights Act was extended by at least one tolling provision and one extension provision so that the charges were still timely.
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/13/2006
- Published 11/13/2006
Judges
- RICHMAN, J.
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley, James A. Lassart and Adrian Driscoll, San Francisco, for Plaintiff and Appellant., Arthur K. Wachtel, San Francisco, Maitreya Badami; Furst & Pendergast, LLP, Peter Furst, San Francisco; Stiglich, Hinckley & Burrell, Lidia Stiglich; Leland Davis III, San Francisco; William Fazio, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Office of the City Attorney, Dennis J. Herrera, City Attorney, Danny Y. Chou, Chief of Appellate Litigation, Molly S. Stump, Chief Attorney, Public Protection Team, David A. Carrillo, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.