California Court of Appeal

Judgment for defendants, in case alleging that a dealership agreement for defendants' rental products was improperly terminated, is affirmed over claims that the trial court erred when it found that there was no franchise agreement within the meaning of the California Franchise Investment Law or the California Franchise Relations Act.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/03/2006
• Published 11/03/2006

Judges

• BRUINIERS, J.*

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Bradford C. Floyd, Eureka, for Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Fulbright & Jaworski James R. Evans, Jr., Palo Alto, David M. Liu, Orange County, for Defendants and Respondents.