Burkle v. Burkle, B188224
Judgment of dismissal against separate civil action brought by wife against husband and two accounting firms, during pendency of marital dissolution proceedings, is affirmed under well-established precedent precluding parties to dissolution proceedings from engaging in "family law waged by other means."
- Decided 10/30/2006
- Published 10/30/2006
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Philip Kaufler, Beverly Hills; Hugh John Gibson, Beverly Hills; and Hillel Chodos, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Christensen, Glaser, Fink, Jacobs, Weil & Shapiro, Patricia L. Glaser, Nabil L. Abu-Assal, Bryan M. Sullivan, Los Angeles; Wasser, Cooperman & Carter, Dennis M. Wasser, Bruce Cooperman and Michael Brourman, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Ronald W. Burkle., Gaelle H. Gralnek, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Ernst & Young LLP in B188224., Parker, Milliken, Clark, O'Hara & Samuelian and William E. Weinberger, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent KPMG LLP in B188224.