California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Burkle v. Burkle, B188224

Judgment of dismissal against separate civil action brought by wife against husband and two accounting firms, during pendency of marital dissolution proceedings, is affirmed under well-established precedent precluding parties to dissolution proceedings from engaging in "family law waged by other means."

Appellate Information

  • Decided 10/30/2006
  • Published 10/30/2006


  • BOLAND, J.


  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellant:
  • Philip Kaufler, Beverly Hills;  Hugh John Gibson, Beverly Hills;  and Hillel Chodos, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Christensen, Glaser, Fink, Jacobs, Weil & Shapiro, Patricia L. Glaser, Nabil L. Abu-Assal, Bryan M. Sullivan, Los Angeles;  Wasser, Cooperman & Carter, Dennis M. Wasser, Bruce Cooperman and Michael Brourman, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Ronald W. Burkle., Gaelle H. Gralnek, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Ernst & Young LLP in B188224., Parker, Milliken, Clark, O'Hara & Samuelian and William E. Weinberger, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent KPMG LLP in B188224.
Copied to clipboard