California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Collins v. Hertz Corp., B185398

Summary judgment for defendants -- after the court struck much of plaintiffs' opposition papers that failed to meet procedural requirements, thus leaving a majority of defendants' facts effectively undisputed -- in case alleging workplace harassment and retaliation, violation of the Family Rights Act, and race, age, and disability discrimination, is affirmed where: 1) page limitation imposed by the trial court is moot and, in any event, was entirely proper; 2) the trial court did not abuse its discretion by striking portions of appellants' separate statement; and 3) no triable issues of material fact remain.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 10/10/2006
  • Published 10/25/2006


  • BOLAND, J.


  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellant:
  • Law Offices of Mark Weidmann, Mark Weidmann and Lee Franck for Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Thelen Reid & Priest, Curtis A. Cole, Fresno, James H. Turken and Nicole M. Duckett, Los Angeles, for Respondents.
Copied to clipboard