California Court of Appeal
Collins v. Hertz Corp., B185398
Summary judgment for defendants -- after the court struck much of plaintiffs' opposition papers that failed to meet procedural requirements, thus leaving a majority of defendants' facts effectively undisputed -- in case alleging workplace harassment and retaliation, violation of the Family Rights Act, and race, age, and disability discrimination, is affirmed where: 1) page limitation imposed by the trial court is moot and, in any event, was entirely proper; 2) the trial court did not abuse its discretion by striking portions of appellants' separate statement; and 3) no triable issues of material fact remain.
Appellate Information
- Decided 10/10/2006
- Published 10/25/2006
Judges
- BOLAND, J.
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Law Offices of Mark Weidmann, Mark Weidmann and Lee Franck for Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Thelen Reid & Priest, Curtis A. Cole, Fresno, James H. Turken and Nicole M. Duckett, Los Angeles, for Respondents.