Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics, Inc. v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA, Inc., A107538

Denial of motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute, in suit for injunctive relief to stop terrifying acts allegedly committed by defendant's members targeting plaintiffs' employees as part of an effort to expose animal abuse in biomedical labs, is affirmed over claims that: 1) the complaint arises from speech about matters of public interest; 2) plaintiff failed to meet its burden of showing a probability that it would prevail on its claims; and 3) the trial court lacked jurisdiction to issue a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction after defendants appealed from the order denying their motion to strike.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 10/12/2006
  • Published 10/12/2006

Judges

  • HAERLE, Acting P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Mark Goldowitz, Berkeley, CA, for Defendant and Appellant., Daniel H. Bookin, Benjamin J. Smietana, Steven E. Swaney, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs and Respondents., Richard A. Jones, Covington & Burling, San Francisco, CA, for Amicus Curiae National Association for Biomedical Research in support of Plaintiffs and Respondents.
Copied to clipboard