California Court of Appeal

Appeals from juvenile court's decision to deny petitioners visitation rights are dismissed as improperly taken from an order made at a hearing in which a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing was set, and petitions for writs of mandate to set aside orders denying reunification services, visitation, and removing a child from one petitioner's custody, are denied as the juvenile court made the required findings, supported by substantial evidence, and did not abuse its discretion.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/03/2006
• Published 10/03/2006

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Valerie N. Lankford, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minors.


• For Appellees:
  
• Diana W. Prince under appointment by the Court of Appeal for Defendant, Appellant, and Petitioner Claudia W., Christopher R. Booth under appointment by the Court of Appeal for Defendant, Appellant, and Petitioner Royce W., Joe S. Rank, County Counsel, and Julie Koons Jarvi, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent and Real Party in Interest., No appearance for Respondent Superior Court of Riverside County.