California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

People v. Carr, E038124

Finding that defendant violated his plea agreement, under which he plead guilty to carjacking and was to be resentenced to a reduced term to be served on weekends, is affirmed over claims that: 1) defendant was not given sufficient notice concerning the alleged violation of the plea agreement; 2) the trial court did not make sufficient findings to justify its conclusion defendant violated the plea agreement; 3) the trial court violated defendant's right to a jury trial when it determined he violated his Vargas waiver; and 4) the trial court failed exercise its discretion to impose the reduced sentence.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/29/2006
  • Published 09/29/2006



  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellees:
  • Jamie L. Popper, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Defendant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Jeffrey J. Koch, Deputy Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Pamela Ratner Sobeck, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard