Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


Grassilli v. Barr, D044931

Verdict against defendant highway patrol officers for retaliating against plaintiff after he complained about an officer's improper conduct, awarding economic, noneconomic, and punitive damages, and attorney fees, is affirmed to the extent substantial evidence supported liability, however, the punitive damage awards are stricken as excessive and in violation of federal constitutional principles, and the case is remanded.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/13/2006
  • Published 09/13/2006

Judges

  • HALLER, Acting P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Donna Bader, Laguna Beach, Garrison & McInnis, L.L.P. and Gregory M. Garrison, Michael W. Strain and Amelia A. McDermott, San Diego, for Plaintiff and Respondent., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, James Humes and James M. Schiavenza, Assistant Attorneys General, Kristin G. Hogue and David F. Taglienti, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Appellants.
Copied to clipboard