California Court of Appeal

Judgment entered following denial of plaintiff's petition for writ of mandate seeking to enjoin defendant school district from expending school bond money to construct a gymnasium is affirmed over claim that the California Constitution prohibits the expenditure as construction of a "gymnasium" was not among the "list of the specific school facilities projects to be funded" in the bond ballot measure approved by the voters.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/12/2006
• Published 09/12/2006

Judges

• DOI TODD, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Angelo & Di Monda, Christopher E. Angelo, Joseph Di Monda, Manhattan Beach;  Law Offices of Anthony Kornarens and Anthony Kornarens, Santa Monica, for Plaintiff and Appellant., Roger Creighton as Amicus Curiae in pro. per. for Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, Terry T. Tao and Jeremy K. Brust, Cerritos, for Defendant and Respondent.