California Court of Appeal
Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP, B178246
Except for dismissal of Cartwright Act claim, judgment in favor of defendant is reversed as: 1) noncompetition agreement prohibiting employee from performing services for former clients is invalid under Business and Professions Code section 16000 unless it falls within statutory or "trade secret" exceptions to statute; 2) requiring plaintiff to execute Termination of Non-Compete Agreement as consideration for release from noncompetition agreement was an independently wrongful act; and 3) requiring plaintiff to waive Labor Code section 2802 indemnity rights as a condition of continued employment violated public policy and was also an independently wrongful act.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/30/2006
- Published 08/30/2006
Judges
- ALDRICH, J.
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Law Offices of Richard A. Love, Richard A. Love and Beth A. Shenfeld, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Latham & Watkins LLP, Wayne S. Flick and Yury Kapgan, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent.