Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

California Court of Appeal


Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP, B178246

Except for dismissal of Cartwright Act claim, judgment in favor of defendant is reversed as: 1) noncompetition agreement prohibiting employee from performing services for former clients is invalid under Business and Professions Code section 16000 unless it falls within statutory or "trade secret" exceptions to statute; 2) requiring plaintiff to execute Termination of Non-Compete Agreement as consideration for release from noncompetition agreement was an independently wrongful act; and 3) requiring plaintiff to waive Labor Code section 2802 indemnity rights as a condition of continued employment violated public policy and was also an independently wrongful act.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/30/2006
  • Published 08/30/2006

Judges

  • ALDRICH, J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Law Offices of Richard A. Love, Richard A. Love and Beth A. Shenfeld, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Latham & Watkins LLP, Wayne S. Flick and Yury Kapgan, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard