Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

California Court of Appeal


Armenta ex rel. City of Burbank v. Mueller Co., B175530

Summary judgments in favor of defendants are reversed where triable issues of fact exist, and the trial court abused its discretion by imposing a condition on granting plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint alleging violation of the California False Claims Act with respect to 130 governmental entities.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/30/2006
  • Published 08/30/2006

Judges

  • SPENCER, P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Irell & Manella, Gregory R. Smith, S. Thomas Pollack, Mark Paluch, Los Angeles;  Phillips & Cohen, Eric R. Havian and Harry Litman, San Francisco, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Beck, DeCorso, Daly, Kreindler & Harris, Bryan D. Daly, Charles L. Kreindler, Barbara E. Taylor, Los Angeles;  Stanzler, Funderburk & Castellon and Ruben A. Castellon, San Francisco, for Defendants and Respondents Mueller Co. and Tyco International (US) Inc., Weston, Benshoof, Rochefort, Rubalcava & MacCuish, David S. MacCuish, Kurt V. Osenbaugh and Andrew M. Gilford, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Watts Industries, Inc.
Copied to clipboard