California Court of Appeal

Summary judgment in favor of cross-defendant is affirmed as the contractual provisions -- limitations precluding recovery of compensation for economic loss and physical harm to equipment and facilities -- represented a valid limitation on liability rather than a complete exemption from responsibility, and that, in any event, cross-complainants have failed to identify a specific law or regulation potentially violated by cross-defendant.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/29/2006
• Published 08/29/2006

Judges

• EPSTEIN, P.J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Ford, Walker, Haggerty & Behar and K. Michele Williams, Long Beach, for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant, TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc., and Cross-complainant and Appellant, Sefton Resources, Inc., Clifford & Brown, Grover H. Waldon, and Daniel T. Clifford for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent.