California Court of Appeal

Judgment for defendant after trial, with declaration that CC&Rs and bylaws did not violate the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act despite unequal assessments, is affirmed as to the legality of the voting and assessment methodology, but is reversed as to amount of award of attorney fees.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/21/2006
• Published 08/21/2006

Judges

• TURNER, P.J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Crandall, Wade & Lowe, and Matthew F. Batezel, Irvine, for Plaintiff, Appellant, and Respondent., Haight Brown & Bonesteel, Bruce Cleeland, Santa Ana, Rita Gunasekaran, and Maureen Haight Gee, Los Angeles, for Defendant, Respondent, and Appellant.