Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


Small Prop. Owners of San Francisco v. City and County of San Francisco, A108924

Judgment that an ordinance of defendant, which required landlords to pay tenants interest on security deposits at a rate of 5 percent, did not effect a taking under state or federal constitutions, is affirmed over claim that the court erred in: 1) in reaching this conclusion; 2) taking judicial notice of credit card interest rates; and 3) in requiring plaintiffs to provide notice of the adverse judgment to class members by mail.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/09/2006
  • Published 08/09/2006

Judges

  • REARDON (THOMAS), J.**

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Zacks Utrecht & Leadbetter, Paul F. Utrecht, Andrew M. Zacks, San Francisco, Eric D. McFarland, Salvatore C. Timpano, Novato, Kemnitzer, Anderson, Barron & Ogilvie, Mark F. Anderson, San Francisco, Counsel for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Dennis J. Herrera, City Attorney, Kristen A. Jensen, Deputy City Attorney, Rafal Ofierski, Deputy City Attorney, Counsel for Defendant and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard