California Court of Appeal

Judgment for plaintiff and denial of judgment notwithstanding the verdict is affirmed over request for new trial or reduction in judgment on grounds that the trial court erred in: 1) denying motion in limine to exclude evidence of amount of medical costs billed to plaintiff in excess of those actually paid; 2) denying posttrial reduction of damage award to reflect compromise of plaintiff's medical bills; 3) limiting the testimony of plaintiff's accident reconstruction expert; and 4) in permitting plaintiff to call an undesignated medical expert.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/05/2006
• Published 08/01/2006

Judges

• BUTZ, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Shea Stokes & Carter, Shirley A. Gauvin, Julissa Robles, San Diego; Trimble, Sherinian & Varanini and Suzanne M. Trimble, Sacramento, for Defendant and Appellant., Dreyer Babich Buccola & Callaham, Roger A. Dreyer, Christopher W. Wood, and Stephen F. Davids, Sacramento, for Plaintiff and Respondent.