California Court of Appeal

Defendants' successful motion to quash a jury venire and begin jury selection again with a new panel of prospective jurors was not a "mistrial" motion, and, because the prosecution was not prejudiced, it did not trigger a new period in which defendants could be "brought to trial" under Penal Code section 1382(a)(2).

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/24/2006
• Published 07/24/2006

Judges

• ROTHSCHILD, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Michael P. Judge, Public Defender, Marie Lui and John Hamilton Scott, Deputy Public Defenders for Petitioner Stanley Bernard Perryman., Janice Y. Fukai, Alternate Public Defender, Michael Goodman and Yvonne Velasquez, Deputy Alternate Public Defenders, for Petitioner Nicole Evyette Gaston., Steve Cooley, District Attorney, Phyllis Asayama and Roberta Schwartz, Deputy District Attorneys, for Real Party in Interest.


• For Appellees:
  
• No appearance for Respondent.