California Court of Appeal

Judgment pursuant to a jury verdict for plaintiff in a loan dispute is reversed pursuant to claims of erroneous exclusion of evidence, where plaintiff's Canadian tax returns were relevant and not privileged, and the trial court abused its discretion when it concluded to the contrary.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/29/2006
• Published 06/29/2006

Judges

• ROTHSCHILD, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Peter Hoffman, in pro. per.;   Gipson Hoffman & Pancione, Kenneth I. Sidle and Corey J. Spivey, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant., Lord, Bissell & Brook, Keith G. Wileman, Los Angeles;  Silver & Freedman, Los Angeles, and Jeffrey S. Kravitz, for Plaintiff and Respondent.