California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Save Our Neighborhood v. Lishman, C049525

In a dispute involving a city's approval of a project for the construction of a hotel, gas station, and convenience store complex, a judgment denying plaintiffs' petition for writ of mandate is reversed where a city's reliance on an addendum to a mitigated negative declaration for the project violated the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/28/2006
  • Published 06/28/2006


  • HULL, J.


  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellant:
  • Stephan C. Volker, San Francisco, Joshua A.H. Harris, Oakland and Marnie E. Riddle for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Remy, Thomas, Moose and Manley, Whitman F. Manley, Sacramento, Sabrina V. Teller and Angela M. Whatley for Defendants and Respondents and for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard