Save Our Neighborhood v. Lishman, C049525
In a dispute involving a city's approval of a project for the construction of a hotel, gas station, and convenience store complex, a judgment denying plaintiffs' petition for writ of mandate is reversed where a city's reliance on an addendum to a mitigated negative declaration for the project violated the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/28/2006
- Published 06/28/2006
Judges
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Stephan C. Volker, San Francisco, Joshua A.H. Harris, Oakland and Marnie E. Riddle for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Remy, Thomas, Moose and Manley, Whitman F. Manley, Sacramento, Sabrina V. Teller and Angela M. Whatley for Defendants and Respondents and for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.