California Court of Appeal

Revocation of defendant's probation and a sentence following a finding that he was no longer eligible for probation under the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act is affirmed over claims: 1) that his procedural rights under the Act and his due process rights were violated in that the court conducted only one hearing on two revocation petitions; and 2) of insufficiency of the evidence.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/07/2006
• Published 06/07/2006

Judges

• SIMS, Acting P.J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Boyd & Kimball and Betsy S. Kimball, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson and Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorneys General, Stephen G. Herndon and Maureen A. Daly, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.