California Court of Appeal

Denial of motions to disclose the identity of an informant, quash a search warrant, and suppress evidence are affirmed where: 1) the government did not procure a breach of the attorney-client privilege when lawyer became confidential informant against defendant; and 2) in camera hearing on motion to quash is proper when defendant believes informant was his lawyer and police procured breach of privilege.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/30/2006
• Published 03/30/2006

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel