Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

California Court of Appeal


Pearlstein v. Pearlstein, A108235

Family court's decision to include, as part of husband's gross income for child support purposes, both cash and the value of stock he received for selling his business, is reversed for including the value of marketable, but unliquidated, stock in the calculation of husband's income.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/28/2006
  • Published 03/28/2006

Judges

  • RUVOLO, J.**

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Garrett C. Dailey, Oakland, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Bernard W. Wolf,Lance A. Russell, for Respondent., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State of California, Thomas R. Yanger, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Margarita Altamirano, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, James Ching, Deputy Attorney General, for Intervenor and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard