California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Fritz v. Ehrmann, B178701

Summary judgment for defendant-attorney pursuant to a statute of limitations defense in a malpractice action relating to a promissory note prepared by defendant is reversed where the facts did not indisputably show that the statute accrued until shortly before prior litigation commenced, and the statute was tolled while defendant represented plaintiff in that litigation.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/24/2006
  • Published 02/24/2006


  • CURRY, J.


  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellant:
  • The Mentislaw Group, Dianna M. Worley, and Diane L. Mancinelli, Tustin, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Meyers & McConnell, Frederick S. Reisz, and Jeffrey Francis Allen, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard