Bandt v. Bd. of Retirement, D044999
Denial of a petition for writ of mandate challenging a Board of Retirement's decision to adopt an interim actuarial valuation of plaintiffs' pension fund is affirmed where the Board did not act against the interests of its members in adopting the interim valuation, and, thus, the Board did not act unconstitutionally.
- Decided 01/30/2006
- Published 01/31/2006
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Law Offices of Michael A. Conger and Michael A. Conger, and Richard H. Benes, San Diego, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Crowell & Moring, Steven P. Rice and Van-Dzung Nguyen, Irvine, for Defendant and Respondent., John J. Sansone, County Counsel, and Diane Bardsley, Assistant County Counsel, for Intevener and Respondent.