Dunn v. County of Santa Barbara, B175149
Judgment on the pleadings for defendant-county on regulatory takings claims, and constitutional and civil rights claims involving defendant's determinations as to a subdivision application is reversed where those claims are ripe for adjudication because defendant issued what amounted to a final decision, and the permissible use of the property is known to a reasonable degree of certainty.
- Decided 01/25/2006
- Published 01/25/2006
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Hatch & Parent, Diane M. Matsinger; Bornholdt, Peron & Pratt and Kenneth C. Bornholdt, San Luis Obispo, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Stephen Shane Stark, County Counsel, Alan L. Seltzer, Chief Assistant County Counsel, Kelly A. Casillas, Deputy County Counsel, for Respondent.