California Court of Appeal

Judgment for agency defendant in a dispute over the distribution of costs for relocation, via undergrounding, of certain municipal electrical transmission facilities to accommodate a freeway widening project is affirmed where the undergrounding constituted a "betterment," and defendant did not abuse its discretion by claiming a credit for the relocation costs.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/06/2006
• Published 01/06/2006

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Jack L. White, City Attorney, and Moses W. Johnson IV, Deputy City Attorney for Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Bruce A. Behrens, Chief Counsel, Linda Cohen Harrel, Deputy Chief Counsel, William T. Kamizolas and Robert W. Vidor for Defendant and Respondent.