California Court of Appeal
Trust One Mortgage Corp. v. Invest Am. Mortgage Corp., G035111
Summary judgment for plaintiff on contract claims involving loans made pursuant to a broker agreement between the parties is affirmed where a contractual indemnification provision in the agreement was an indemnity, and not a guaranty, and does not violate California's antideficiency laws.
- Decided 12/15/2005
- Published 12/16/2005
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellees:
- Weinstock & Scavo and Brett A. Mendell for Defendants and Appellants., Solomon, Grindle, Silverman & Spinella, Timothy J. Silverman and Benjamin T. Morton, San Diego, for Plaintiff and Respondent.