Saben, Earlix & Assocs. v. Fillet, G034572
Order denying an attorney fee motion in an underlying case is reversed where the district court erroneously determined that the entry of an order granting summary judgment triggered the running of the time limit for the filing of an attorney fee motion, even though no summary judgment had ever been entered.
- Decided 12/09/2005
- Published 12/09/2005
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- William J. Davis, in pro. per., for Intervener and Appellant., Jessica D. Lew; William J. Davis and Kathryn J. Woods for Intervener and Appellant Davis & Company.
- For Appellees:
- Peter L. Weinberger & Associates, Peter L. Weinberger, Los Angeles, and A. Douglas Mastroianni for Plaintiff and Respondent.