Gin v. Penn. Life Ins. Co., A109541
Summary judgment for defendant-insurer is affirmed where plaintiff suffered no "accidental bodily injury" as that term is defined in the policy and in California law when she developed carpal tunnel syndrome over time as a result of her ordinary work activities.
- Decided 12/09/2005
- Published 12/09/2005
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Joseph Scanlon, Law Offices of Joseph Scanlon, Oakland, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Richard P. Tricker, Thomas J. Kearney, Anderson, McPharlin & Conners, LLP, Los Angeles, for Respondent.