California Court of Appeal

In a challenge to the approval of the construction of a retail warehouse facility, even though the trial court found that the mitigated negative declaration certified by defendant-City needed revision, it did not abuse its discretion when it denied plaintiff's motion for attorney fees.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/25/2005
• Published 07/26/2005

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Van Blarcom, Leibold, McClendon & Mann, Stephen M. Miles, John G. McClendon, Laguna Hills, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Jones and Mayer, Kimberly Hall Barlow, Krista MacNevin Jee, Fullerton, for Defendant and Respondent., Greenberg, Glusker, Fields, Claman, Machtinger & Kinsella and Garrett L. Hanken, Los Angeles, for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.