Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


Tain v. State Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners, A106656

Plaintiffs' challenge to the California Code of Regulations, which defines the scope of chiropractic practice, is dismissed where plaintiffs' claims lack merit.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/22/2005
  • Published 06/23/2005

Judges

  • RUVOLO, J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Veritas Justice & Bioethics Institute, David Prescott and Hon. Edwin Grauke, Counsel for Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State of California, James M. Humes, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Alfredo Terrazas, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Frank H. Pacoe, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Char Sachson, Deputy Attorney General, Counsel for Respondent.
Copied to clipboard