Schulz v. Neovi Data Corp., G033879
Dismissal of plaintiff's complaint, alleging that defendant-credit card company aided and abetted in the operation of an illegal lottery, is reversed where plaintiff sufficiently pleads a cause of action for aiding and abetting.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/06/2005
- Published 05/06/2005
Judges
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Lakeshore Law Center and Jeffrey Wilens, Yorba Linda, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Law Offices of Eric D. Morton and Eric D. Morton, Oceanside, for Defendant and Respondent Neovi Data Corporation., Kelly, Herlihy & Klein, Thomas M. Herlihy, Michael G. Glanzberg, San Francisco; and Mukesh Advani, San Francisco, for Defendant and Respondent Ginix, Inc., Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Gail E. Lees, Los Angeles, Elizabeth A. Brem and Christopher Chorba, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent PaySystems, Inc., Cooley Godward, Michael G. Rhodes, San Diego, Lori R.E. Ploeger, San Francisco, and James R. Patterson for Defendant and Respondent PayPal, Inc.