OVERLAND v. LA SUPER. CT., B175442
The court defendants' refusal to pay plaintiff pre-exoneration interest on cash bail deposits does not constitute a "taking" since there is no confiscation of private property by the court defendants for a public purpose.
- Decided 01/28/2005
- Published 01/28/2005
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Overland Borenstein Scheper & Kim and Mark A. Borenstein for Petitioners., Morrison & Foerster, John W. Alden, Jr. and Cynthia L. Gillette, Los Angeles, for Real Parties in Interest.
- For Appellees:
- No appearance for Respondent.