California Court of Appeal
PATERNO v. SUPERIOR COURT OF YUBA COUNTY (STATE OF CALIFORNIA), C046473
Under Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6(a)(2), a new peremptory challenge following a reversal on appeal will only be permitted where the court is required to re-examine issues litigated in the prior proceeding.
Appellate Information
- Decided 10/26/2004
- Published 10/26/2004
Judges
- BUTZ, J.
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Desmond, Nolan, Livaich & Cunningham, Gary Livaich, David Collins, Richard F. Desmond, Sacramento; Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, Scott G. Johnson, Minneapolis, MN; Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin, Jerome B. Falk, Jr., Simon J. Frankel, San Francisco; Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard, Lloyd Hinkelman, Sacramento; Frederik A. Jacobsen, San Mateo; Law Offices of Stanley J. Bell, San Francisco, and Sally G. Bergman for Petitioners., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Andrea Hoch, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Darryl Doke, Lead Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Sterling A. Smith, Deputy Attorney General, for Real Party in Interest The State of California., Law Offices of Carl R. Lindmark and Carl R. Lindmark, Yuba City, for Real Party in Interest Reclamation District 784.
- For Appellees:
- No appearance for Respondent.