TRAVELERS CAS. AND SUR. CO. v. TRANSCONTINENTAL INS. CO., E033110
Summary judgment in favor of defendant-insurance company's claim that it did not have a duty to defend is reversed where defendant's duty to defend, pursuant to the plain language of the policy, was triggered upon the exhaustion of the Primary Policy.
- Decided 09/29/2004
- Published 09/29/2004
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellees:
- Law Offices of Adrienne D. Cohen, Adrienne D. Cohen, Elizabeth T. Evans, and Craig A. Barnes, for Defendants and Appellants., Correll, Garchie & Edwards, James E. Friedhofer, San Diego, and Susan E. Leonard, for Intervenor and Respondent.