SAFECO INS. CO. v. PARKS, B170730
The trial court erred in finding that plaintiff-insurance company had a duty to defend where plaintiff reasonably declined the defense since information given to plaintiff disclosed no potential that defendant was an insured under the policy.
- Decided 09/23/2004
- Published 09/23/2004
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Raymond H. Goettsch,Scott K. Murch, Long Beach; LaTorraca and Goettsch, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Pulverman, Pulverman; Martin E. Pulverman, Raymond J. Pulverman, Santa Barbara, and James S. Bianchi, for Jamey Lynn Parks, Defendant and Respondent., Law Offices of Wayne McClean; Wayne McClean, Woodland Hills, for Michelle Miller, Defendant and Respondent.