California Court of Appeal
SIMUNDZA v. SIMUNDZA, G032753
Plaintiff's suit to modify a martial dissolution judgment, based on the increased value of defendant's pension benefit, is dismissed where the stipulated judgment completely resolved the division of the pension benefit and thus the pension benefit is not a partially omitted asset within the meaning of Family code section 2556.
Appellate Information
- Decided 09/02/2004
- Published 09/02/2004
Judges
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Nancy Bennett Bunn, Newport Beach, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Ralph T. Evans, Fullerton, for Respondent.