California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

SIMUNDZA v. SIMUNDZA, G032753

Plaintiff's suit to modify a martial dissolution judgment, based on the increased value of defendant's pension benefit, is dismissed where the stipulated judgment completely resolved the division of the pension benefit and thus the pension benefit is not a partially omitted asset within the meaning of Family code section 2556.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/02/2004
  • Published 09/02/2004

Judges

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Nancy Bennett Bunn, Newport Beach, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Ralph T. Evans, Fullerton, for Respondent.
Copied to clipboard