California Court of Appeal

The trial court's order for plaintiff to pay defendant, the alleged beneficiary of an agreement between the parties, is vacated where the Attachment Law does not authorize such an order to be issued and defendant has not shown his legal remedy to be inadequate.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/25/2004
• Published 08/25/2004

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• White O'Connor Curry & Avanzado, Melvin N.A. Avanzado, Los Angeles, John J. Lucas, and Amanda M. Hammond for Petitioners., Meisenheimer Herron & Steele, Matthew V. Herron, San Diego, and Robert M. Steele, Mendocino, for Real Party in Interest.


• For Appellees:
  
• No appearance for Respondent.