California Court of Appeal

Defendant's product rebate program does not violate the statutory proscription against offering a rebate "contingent on an event to occur subsequent to the consummation of the transaction," Civ. Code, section 1770(a)(17), where the language of defendant's rebate sticker cannot be read to require a subsequent purchase to obtain a rebate.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/11/2004
• Published 08/11/2004

Judges

• BOREN, P.J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Morris, Polich & Purdy, David J. Vendler, Los Angeles, Mark E. Hellenkamp, San Diego, Richard H. Nakamura, Jr.;  Goldberg and Goldberg, Barry P. Goldberg, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, Claude M. Stern and Patrick C. Doolittle, Redwood Shores, for Defendant and Respondent.