California Court of Appeal

Defendant successfully challenged his conviction after the superior court erred in denying his motion to suppress a handgun and statements obtained pursuant to a warrantless stop and frisk, on grounds that the officer did not have enough facts to create a reasonable suspicion that defendant was engaged in criminal activity.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/10/2004
• Published 08/10/2004

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Larry L. Dixon, Jackson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, J. Robert Jibson and Judy Kaida, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.