Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


STASZ v. CHARLES SCHWAB, B159163

Plaintiff's attempt to avoid the effect of an arbitration provision contained in a settlement agreement, to which she and defendant are parties, is rejected.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/05/2004
  • Published 08/05/2004

Judges

  • MALLANO, J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Shanel Stasz, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin, Kenneth G. Hausman and Bernard A. Burk, San Francisco, for Defendants and Respondents Charles R. Schwab, David S. Pottruck, The Charles Schwab Corporation, Law Offices of Robert Kligman, Robert Kligman, Monika Young, Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin, Kenneth G. Hausman, Bernard A. Burk, Joseph M. Quinn III, Douglas A. Winthrop, Mark A. Sheft and Hugo W. Quackenbush., Irsfeld, Irsfeld & Younger and C. Phillip Jackson, Glendale, for Defendant and Respondent American Arbitration Association.
Copied to clipboard